Editorial policy

We aim to make useful, readable material about everyday wellbeing without presenting personal preferences as universal truths. Our articles should be clear about their scope, careful with claims and open to correction.

Accuracy and clarity

We check factual statements against appropriate sources and distinguish established information from interpretation or suggestion. We avoid inflated promises, explain uncertainty where it matters and revise wording that could make a general idea sound like personal medical advice. Readers should consult a qualified professional for health concerns or decisions that need individual assessment.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial choices are made for reader relevance, not to guarantee favourable treatment. Paid, gifted or partner-supported material is identified clearly where it appears; a partnership does not make an endorsement automatic. We do not disguise promotional material as independent editorial coverage.

Corrections and illustrations

If something is inaccurate or unclear, readers can contact us through the Contact page. We review correction requests, update material when warranted and make the change clear when context calls for it. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; they are visual aids, not evidence or documentary photographs.